vitalwholeness

I usually don’t like strained attempts to go back a millennium and capture the life of anyone, much less a 12th century Benedictine mystic, but the creators of Vision: The life of Hildegard von Bingen did her right.

For a glimpse into the monastic spirituality of the time, and a spotlight on the bright light of Hildegard’s visions, do find a way to see it.

And for those hymnology buffs among us you’ll be interested to know that in our Chalice Hymnal there are no less than three quotes from Hildegard’s writings and one hymn that weaves many strands of her writing together in one place (251, O Holy Spirit, Root of Life).

Fire of the Spirit, life of the lives of creatures,

spiral of sanctity, bond of all natures,

goal of charity, lights of clarity,

taste of sweetness to sinners, be with us and hear us.

Composer of all things, light of all the risen,

key of salvation, release from the dark prison,

hope of all unions, scope of chastities,

joy in the glory, strong honor, be with us and hear us . (CH 52)

* * *

Holy Spirit

making life alive, moving in all things, root of all created being,

cleansing the cosmos of every impurity, effacing guilt, anointing wounds.

You are lustrous and praiseworthy life,

You waken and re-awaken everything that is. (CH 235)

* * *

Creator God, draw compassion from us.

Christ, draw compassion from us.

Spirit God, draw compassion from us. (CH 541)

I confess my ignorance. I have no idea why the U.S. military is intervening in Libya’s civil war. Of course, Gadhafi is no sweet guy; he is a totalitarian dictator. In the wave of Northern Africa protest movements bad guys are falling left and right and largely non-violent protests have taken the day. But Gadhafi is not going quietly. And the rebel movement is armed and there is open warfare.

So, do we normally intervene – other than in peace-making diplomacy – in every armed civil war taking place in other countries around the globe? We never thought of that kind of response in Egypt, even if it got nasty. Why snuggle up to the rebels in Libya? Is it our dear love of democracy? Neutralizing some terrorist network?

How jaded I’ve become. It actually occurred to me that all this just might have to do with the gigantic oil fields under that Libyan sand. And we might just be betting on the horse we believe win this struggle for power, the one left standing at the end of the day, our good friend flying his flag right over the oil fields.

Why else intervene? Can you think of one viable reason? Before you play the freedom card and say we’re just helping to liberate those poor Libyan people from the shackles of tyranny, you have to first scan the long list of all the other countries submerged in civil war where we did not intervene, every country that didn’t have one drop of oil to its name.

But, of course, I could be very, very wrong.

Why are we lobbing our cruise missiles their direction?

Strange + Strange often = True

As I read the most recent issue of Sojourners (April 2011) I ran across a brief report from Ray McGovern relating to the now famous (or infamous) WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange.  The combination of unusual author and atypical assumptions lent a “luster of midday to objects below.”

First strange bit: Author Ray McGovern was a career CIA guy, an analyst for 27 years. He lived and slept intelligence and saw it all from the inside. That leads to strange number two.

Second strange bit: Now speaking for the church, from the inside of a religious point of view, McGovern defends the whole WikiLeaks enterprise. In fact, he paints Assange not as an enemy of the state, but rather as an enemy of the state of denial.

Sidetrack: At the unavoidable risk of dating myself, I’ll share that while I was in college the then controversial Daniel Ellsberg came to my campus and spoke. We were packed like sardines in a large conference hall. And I remember his arrival, his words and the impact of them. Ellsberg was the WikiLeaks of his time, sans the electronic means to broadcast it by web, blog, text, or tweet. He just wrote about it and talked to groups about it. The Pentagon Papers simply revealed the unimaginable extent and scope of US incursions in the world. And Ellsberg was painted with the same “unpatriotic” brush as Assange is today. They tried to assassinate his character, make him into a criminal, define him as enemy of the state. But I digress.

Back to our former CIA agent become church activist. McGovern simply knows, from experience, how assassinations are ordered, secret covert missions conducted, and disappeared persons detained and tortured. So when WikiLeaks “outs” this, makes impossible our denial that such things are taking place on our tax dime and on our behalf, he simply nods. He knows it’s true. And the docs and video footage leaked by WikiLeaks verify it.

What McGovern also knows is that every attempt is made to “kill the messenger” when the messenger carries information that uncovers the truth. If we can make him appear shady, criminal, and an enemy of the state, he can be delegitimated, the ultimate goal. If not physically assassinated, his reputation can be. Then he can be dismissed with the wave of a hand.

I am fairly suspicious of claims made by anyone in the political realm. People just twist things to conform to their already existing point of view. But sometimes Strange + Strange = True. I think this is one of those cases. And unless the truth becomes known, and citizens insist that this is not the way we want to behave on the world stage, then we will continue in a state of denial. And not even WikiLeaks will be able to help us.

I just viewed that remarkable BBC drama based on actual events inside one of the Nazi death camps during World War II, God on Trial. As a way to make sense of the unthinkable, Jews convene a court, bringing forth any and all evidence that might either vindicate or find God guilty. But guilty of what? Murder? But is there some other reason for God’s absence, for allowing this to happen? Hasn’t God broken covenant? Is this punishment? Purification? Of not of individuals, then of the whole? Or is this simply the consequence of extending human beings freedom, even freedom to do evil? In the end, say some, Hitler will be dead, the war over, but Torah will live on. But at what cost?

God is found guilty. But then they worship God on the way to the gas chambers, the ovens.

In the midst of Holocaust, or any genocide, or mass suffering by natural or human cause, it would be easy to dismiss God, the idea of God, as irrelevant. I can see that happening. It is harder to hold on to belief while not knowing why things are the way they are. But what seems harder still, to me, is to still hold on to faith while allowing the suffering to revise one’s sense of how God might be present in the world. Maybe it is, but not as we imagined it to be. With that we may not need to find God guilty because that isn’t how God acts in the world, anyway. We would find God neither guilty or innocent, but rather present or not.

In the same way we might no longer hold God responsible for what happened to Jesus, some bloody transaction to soothe some unresolved justice.  But we do see God present in the suffering of Jesus; wherever there is suffering, there is God.

Revelation:

St. Pats is no big deal in Ireland. On this day, says my Irish friends, we might go to mass and then next door to the pub. But that’s normal. Then home like always. None of this green stuff and cultural parties.

What’s with those Americans, anyway? They are trying to be more Irish than the Irish.

But when we’re far from home, from origins, then the celebration that didn’t used to matter that much comes to matter a great deal.

What you don’t have, you want. What you do have, you take for granted. What’s far you want to bring near. And what’s near you chose to ignore.

Well, dang. Just pinch me.

When I was a child and was exposed to the requisite Christian education, the ten commandments, of course, were included in the mix. And as far as a rule-based approach to religion it made sense. Conduct yourself in these ways, toward God and toward your neighbor. To not is to violate and harm relationships divine and human. And most of the commandments made rather immediate sense. Don’t murder. Don’t worship things other than God. If you borrow your neighbor’s lawn mower, give it back.

But there was one of them with which I never really connected: “Do not bear false witness against your neighbor.” The cliff notes interpretation from parents was almost, “Don’t lie about your neighbor.” I thought, alright, this is about honesty. Well it was about honesty, but it is about much more than that.

Only in adulthood did I discover the importance of the stricture against bearing false witness. I discovered it through experience, by witnessing people bearing false witness. It was after those encounters that I understood that bearing false witness is a form of violence against another. The implicit deceit harms the neighbor in multitudes of ways, including matters of life and death.

I discovered that false witness could send an innocent person to the gallows. I discovered that false witness could ruin a person’s career, and therefore the ability to earn a living. I discovered that false witness could break the bonds of trust where they were needed most – in families, friendships and even in the church. Especially in the church.

One of my favorite film series has been The Tutors, and I just finished the last episode. I’m chasing the film series with Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall, a historical fiction of the same period of time. Bearing false witness was one of the favorite pastimes in Henry VIII’s court. It inevitably sent people to the Tower of London, and from there to beheading, burning, and one of the real favorites of sadists, drawing and quartering. The interesting thing is that most of the time the accusations, sentencing and executions had only the slightest relationship to truth, innocence or guilt. It had to do with who held power and who used it to get what they wanted. Bearing false witness was a way of life. People could literally lose their heads as a result.

At the heart of false witness is a willingness to lie in order to harm someone and benefit yourself. It is the essence of selfcenteredness.

We see it today in the political realm. People lie. They don’t mind it a bit. And lies are often distortions of the truth and the purveying of half-truths. When directed at people or groups it becomes bearing false witness. Human rights violations are justified with false witness. Innocent people are hacked to death with false witness. Countries are invaded as the result of bearing false witness. People are lynched in the town square after false witness. Some innocent people sit on death row on account of false witness. Individuals  lie and institutions lie with intent to protect themselves at the expense of others. They are all bearing false witness.

So now I know what it means. I also know why it made the big ten. It’s a form of murder, of character assassination. I just discovered another example today. Some people who are guilty as sin have painted an innocent person as a villain. They tell lies to do so.

One of the sad parts, pathetic parts, is that though their deceit may not injure their target as they wish it would,  it is nevertheless corroding their own hearts like battery acid poured on tin. It disfigures the soul of the one doing it, regardless of who is hurt or how much.

Jesus was the object of false witness, of course, as his opposition attempted to discredit him. The Easter story reminds us that though someone may be harmed in the short haul it never seems to stick in the long run because the truth has a way of having the last say. And that’s hopeful, really hopeful, considering our track record and the exceedingly weird creatures that we are.

It could have been holy communion, consumed by the largest assembly of Cardinals I’ve ever seen in one place. The untimely snow prompted the gathering, red against white, the bird feeder a chapel, the troughs altar rails.

The seed of Christ.

Tonight I attended our CORE worship, our Sunday evening alternative service that meets at the Orr St. Galleries. We began a Lenten-long theme on doubt, and the focal piece in the center of the room was a tree – made of gathered branches. At one point in the service we were encouraged to write our doubts on paper leaves and hang them on the tree.

During our time of prayer, the doubts were read aloud and offered to God. It was a remarkable moment. With permission given by and to the whole community, a most honest offering of doubt was surfaced and shared, with no fear. And hearing them, the roots of every doubt, provided a kind of freedom that was refreshing.

So often religious communities are so preoccupied with what they believe, what they suppose themselves to know, that they don’t carve out time to recognize the obvious, that each soul is carrying unresolved questions of faith. And if we do not provide space for them to be named, known and shared, we will find more things to cover them and pretend that they don’t exist.

In Paul Tillich’s little classic book, Dynamics of Faith, he spoke of doubt not as the opposite of faith, but rather as a part of faith, as the confirmation that which is being taken ultimately. Only such seriousness will bring forth the experience of doubt, because we do not doubt that about which we care little.

This is faithful doubting, the doubt that speaks, clarifies, and draws us ever nearer to the center of the matter.

Happy doubting.

Ash Wednesday

Act the First

Christians who observe Ash Wednesday are an even tinier sliver of the population than rank and file Sunday church goers are. So when when a practicing Christians who just left an Ash Wednesday service waltz into a grocery store with black stuff on their foreheads, the majority of people think they forgot to wash their faces. Nothing a good washcloth and some soap and water couldn’t take care of.

This is the day when the historic church snatches away the lace covering that has been concealing our brokenness and mortality. We’re supposed to look them straight in the eye, these two: We haven’t loved God or neighbor and our shelf life is limited. When it comes to a staring contest with these twins we’re the ones who avert our eyes every time.

Act the Second

On this Ash Wednesday one soul ended his life’s journey just as another began. Kenny passed the baton to Stella. While we are in life, we are in death. While we are in death, we are in life.

Act the Third

I’ve received my share of ashes and worn them as the sign they are. As I leaned forward a smudgy finger moved across my forehead in the shape of the cross. X marks the spot I often think to myself. And I have to admit, beyond all my rationalizations, how I really am and how life is. And when I am capable of  surrendering I’m driven to the mercy of God.

But then there is the imposing of them on someone else. That’s what pastors get to do year after year. And it’s an entirely different story.

Here is the thing: In this power-laden ritual, you are saying, through the tradition of the church, that none of us are going to make out of this world alive. And we’re also saying that there are times when we’ve missed the mark by a mile. And you place this sign on each face that comes before you.

There are the old, wrinkled faces, whose time for this world  is really not that long. There are those who are wanting to find a faith that matters. Your loved ones show up, your children and spouses and family, and you mark them the same. Here is the nervous teenager who is concerned about appearance, and then come the smooth faces of the very young. What could a child possibly know about corruption or death? Not much, not yet. But they will. And that’s the reason the church teaches about it now and not later.

When this moment comes, of imposing the ashes, and my fingers mark the sign on these foreheads, it is impossible for me to be tender enough. If I could use a feather, I would. There is no way I can say the words, from dust you have come, and to dust you will return, with  enough compassion.

If I could, I would hold each person’s life as one does a newborn baby, rocking them gently in protective arms.  But all I have are the ashes, the sign, the words, and a love that never seems deep enough for the task.

Make it enough, O God.

So I’m watching the evening news. Of course there is a special on Mardi Gras, one that includes some interviews with revelers.

Announcer: “So what do you love about Mardi Gras, Fat Tuesday, most?”

Reveler: “I just love the way we can have a big party before tomorrow, which is Ash Wednesday, when we observe the birth of our Lord.”

I see.